No Difference in Nutritional Value Between Organic and Conventional Foods

No Difference in Nutritional Value Between Organic and Conventional Foods

ID: 179708

(firmenpresse) - PHILADELPHIA, PA -- (Marketwire) -- 09/03/12 -- There is generally no difference in nutritional value or risk for bacterial contamination between organic and conventional foods, according to a new study being published in Annals of Internal Medicine, the flagship journal of the American College of Physicians (ACP). While the consumption of organic fruits and vegetables reduced exposure to any detectable pesticide residues by 30 percent, pesticide levels were generally within the allowable limits for safety.

Researchers conducted a systematic review of 17 human studies and 223 studies of nutrient and contaminant levels in unprocessed foods such as fruits, vegetables, grains, milk, eggs, chicken, pork and meat to compare the health, nutritional, and safety characteristics of organic and conventional foods. They found that the published literature lacks strong evidence that organic foods are significantly more nutritious than conventional foods.

"Some believe that organic food is always healthier and more nutritious," said Crystal Smith-Spangler, MD MS, a VA Physician Fellow at CHP/PCOR, and lead author of the paper. "My colleagues and I were a little surprised that we didn't find that."

The researchers did find weak evidence of the nutritional superiority of organic foods in that organic produce contained significantly higher levels of total phenols, a compound that may have antioxidant properties, and that organic milk and chicken contained significantly higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids. However, the researchers concluded that since few people have phosphorous deficiency, the finding has little clinical significance.

Sales of organic foods have increased dramatically is the US. Between 1997 and 2010 organic food sales have risen from $3.6 billion to over $26 billion annually. Prices vary, but consumers my pay up to twice as much for organic foods versus conventional. In general, to be certified "organic," produce must be grown without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers or routine use of antibiotics or growth hormones. Organic livestock are fed organically produced feed and are free to roam outdoors. In addition, organic regulations typically require that organic foods are processed without irradiation or chemical food additives and are not grown from genetically modified organisms.





For more information, please visit

Embedded Video Available:





Angela C. Collom
Senior Public Relations Associate
American College of Physicians
Office: 215-351-2653

Weitere Infos zu dieser Pressemeldung:

Themen in dieser Pressemitteilung:


Unternehmensinformation / Kurzprofil:
drucken  als PDF  an Freund senden  Lunchables Lunch Combinations and Tori Spelling Invite America to Help Fuel Kid Fun for All 'Team Berger Kahn' Autism Walk Team to Be Led by Partner Lance LaBelle
Bereitgestellt von Benutzer: MARKETWIRE
Datum: 03.09.2012 - 21:15 Uhr
Sprache: Deutsch
News-ID 179708
Anzahl Zeichen: 0

contact information:
Town:

PHILADELPHIA, PA



Kategorie:

Food



Diese Pressemitteilung wurde bisher 266 mal aufgerufen.


Die Pressemitteilung mit dem Titel:
"No Difference in Nutritional Value Between Organic and Conventional Foods"
steht unter der journalistisch-redaktionellen Verantwortung von

American College of Physicians (Nachricht senden)

Beachten Sie bitte die weiteren Informationen zum Haftungsauschluß (gemäß TMG - TeleMedianGesetz) und dem Datenschutz (gemäß der DSGVO).


Alle Meldungen von American College of Physicians



 

Werbung



Facebook

Sponsoren

foodir.org The food directory für Deutschland
Informationen für Feinsnacker finden Sie hier.

Firmenverzeichniss

Firmen die firmenpresse für ihre Pressearbeit erfolgreich nutzen
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z