Oral Arguments; Constitutional Rights to Cannabis? The Right to Choose Healthcare And Protection for a woman in Washington state
Freedom and Bodily Autonomy for Medical Marijuana.
(firmenpresse) - Oral arguments for the Human Rights Legal case of Wilson v. Lynch at the 9th Circuit Court of the United States of America, Browning Federal Court House in San Francisco, California on Thursday morning, July 21, 2016.
Moving into its 5th year, the case tests the first, second, fourth and fifth amendments of the US Constitution for a woman who is registered with a medical marijuana card. 60% of Americans approve the legal use of cannabis per Gallup polls. The plaintiff contends that all people have a right to free speech, their choice of health care and basic rights of protection, including from undue process. The case brings to the forefront more than just one Washington woman’s ‘right to choose’ in a contentiously ‘medically legal’ cannabis state.
Medical cannabis has been known since ancient times to have positive health effects. 25 US states have regulated its medical use. Even with this approval, patients who may or may not be using medical marijuana/cannabis are still categorized as criminals. The federal law classifies cannabis as a dangerous drug similar to opiates, despite research clearly showing its multiple benefits. ‘Patients are out of Patience.’ Even with the legalization of medical cannabis, discrimination continues. In the case of Wilson v. Lynch, the defendants egregiously violated the fifth amendment, contending the plaintiff is an “unlawful user” of a controlled substance. She was deprived of her rights to secure a firearm for self-defense.
A more pressing problem is the rising number of people addicted to opioids and the drug’s effects on the population. According to the American Society of Addiction Medicine, opioid addiction includes the use of the illicit drug heroin and prescription pain relievers such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, codeine and fentanyl. Over 259 million prescriptions per year are written for opioids. This number is more than enough to provide each American a bottle of prescription opiate pills.
More information about the case can be found http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/view.php?hearing=July%20-%20James%20R.%20Browning%20U.S.%20Courthouse,%20San%20Francisco&dates=18-22&year=2016
Contact:
Chaz Rainey, Esq.
Rainey Legal Group
Address: 388 Market Street, Ste. 1300, San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: +1 (415) 578-4600
Fax: +1 (415) 276-1983
E-mail: chaz(at)raineylegal.com
Themen in dieser Pressemitteilung:
Unternehmensinformation / Kurzprofil:
Datum: 22.07.2016 - 04:12 Uhr
Sprache: Deutsch
News-ID 484774
Anzahl Zeichen: 2520
contact information:
Kategorie:
Business News
Typ of Press Release: bitte
type of sending: Veröffentlichung
Diese Pressemitteilung wurde bisher 475 mal aufgerufen.
Die Pressemitteilung mit dem Titel:
"Oral Arguments; Constitutional Rights to Cannabis? The Right to Choose Healthcare And Protection for a woman in Washington state"
steht unter der journalistisch-redaktionellen Verantwortung von
Rainey Legal Group (Nachricht senden)
Beachten Sie bitte die weiteren Informationen zum Haftungsauschluß (gemäß TMG - TeleMedianGesetz) und dem Datenschutz (gemäß der DSGVO).
